In this Blog I will discuss Life the Universe and Everything, and maybe even Prairie Home Companion.
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Avoiding 'Made In China' Labels Not An Easy Task
read more | digg story
Supreme Court Just Took Us Back to the Days of Segregation
read more | digg story
Letter from the White House to Judiciary Committee Chairmen
read more | digg story
Bush Is Told to Justify Executive Privilege
read more | digg story
White House Changes History: Erases 'Mission Accomplished' Banner
read more | digg story
Terrorism and Bin Laden Expert Has a Lesson for Giuliani
read more | digg story
Bush mentions al Qaida 27 times in latest Iraq speech
read more | digg story
Ron Paul at Iowa rally LIVE
read more | digg story
Bush Facing "Contempt of Congress"
read more | digg story
Prince gives away his new CD, Music industry goes nuts
read more | digg story
Keith Olbermann And The House Of Scandal
read more | digg story
Congress threatens White House with subpoena enforcement
read more | digg story
Friday, June 29, 2007
Bush aims for Congress trade deal
read more | digg story
Did Dick Cheney kill 70,000 salmon?
read more | digg story
Giuliani's Cocaine Connection
read more | digg story
Protesting the Iraq War? YOU could lose your basic rights and be tortured.
read more | digg story
Dr. Ron Paul On Immigration & Iowa Rally
read more | digg story
Fighting Government Anti-Drug Propaganda: Tell the Public the Real Truth
read more | digg story
FBI and CIA behind Ron Paul Media Blackout
read more | digg story
New York Moves To Ban Public Filming And Photography
read more | digg story
Media Matters:AP uncritically reported reasons for excluding Ron Paul
read more | digg story
Iran on 26 Gallons a Month
read more | digg story
Bush, Mideast Wars and End-Time Prophecy
read more | digg story
Dick Cheney Secedes
WASHINGTON-ISH (CAP) - Beltway pundits were universally taken by surprise Wednesday when Vice President Richard Bruce Cheney renounced his US citizenship and declared his intention to create his own country.
"Cheneyvania looks forward to having a strong relationship with King Dick's former country, the United States," said the fledgling state's new Court spokesman, Brit Hume. He spoke to reporters following yesterday afternoon's coronation ceremony.
"We've got her back militarily, culturally, and economically," said Hume. "Upon purchase of a standing army, or the successful culmination of contract negotiations with Blackwater Consulting, we anticipate becoming eager and rabid participants in the Coalition of the Willing."
While many politicians and analysts were caught off-balance by the announcement, some saw it as the natural evolutionary step for a man who has become increasingly politically isolated.
"He's not part of the executive branch, he's not part of the legislative branch, well, what is he?" asked NBC political analyst Maria Flamenco. "With aides quitting all around him or getting hauled off to jail, he must have figured, well, this one's pretty much shot, why not start my own frigging country?
"He's got the experience running one, and his Halliburton kick-back pin-money," said Flamenco. "He should be off the ground and running pretty quickly."
The first order of business in Cheneyvania will be actually selecting a geographical space in which to house it. Several secret bunker locations are reportedly being considered, as is a 30x50 mile section of Iran that has so far not been "dibbed" by any major oil company.
In addition to the official name, several other sovereign identifiers have already been worked out and adopted, including the official motto ("Go fuck yourself") and official bird (a pile of smoldering feathers interlaced with warm buckshot).
Bush plays al Qaida card to bolster Iraq support
read more | digg story
Congress Needs to Stop Playing in Bush s Court
read more | digg story
Texas DA Won't Prosecute Any Pedophiles Nabbed in NBC 'Predator' Show
read more | digg story
A Message from Ron Paul
read more | digg story
America: 'More Terrible' Than Stalin’s Russia?
read more | digg story
Putin Advanced Team Caught Using Counterfeit U.S. Money!
read more | digg story
Bush Faces `No-Win' Pressures to Pardon Convicted Cheney Aide
With the start of Libby's 2 1/2-year prison term looming, Republican stalwarts who are the president's last source of political support may revolt unless he quickly pardons the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney. If Bush does act, he would violate Justice Department guidelines, alienate much of the public and run the risk of cover-up charges.
``This is a no-win situation for Bush,'' said David Gergen, who advised Presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.
Libby, 56, was convicted in March of obstructing justice, perjury and making false statements to investigators probing the 2003 leak of Central Intelligence Agency agent Valerie Plame's identity. Unless a federal appeals court delays his sentence, he will be required to report to jail by late July or mid-August.
A Cable News Network/Opinion Research survey conducted after Libby's conviction found that 69 percent of respondents opposed a pardon while 18 percent favored it. At the same time, a pro-Libby firestorm is being fanned by self-described conservative bloggers and talk-radio hosts, and many conservative leaders are asking the president to step in.
`Railroaded'
Libby was ``railroaded,'' said Paul Weyrich, head of the Washington-based Free Congress Foundation, a small-government educational group. David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union, based in Alexandria, Virginia, said Libby got a ``raw deal'' and has been left to ``twist in the wind.''
Keene calls on Bush to display the same loyalty to Libby that he's shown to his friend Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, whose handling of the dismissal of eight U.S. prosecutors has prompted lawmakers to call for his resignation.
``It tells you what a deep, dark, dank un-spinnable hole Bush is in when he has to pardon a guy to appease 30 percent of the country,'' said Democratic strategist Chris Lehane, a former aide to Vice President Al Gore.
A pardon might also raise fresh questions about whether Libby had been acting at the request of his superiors. ``I think he sort of took one for the team,'' said Weyrich.
Divided Candidates
Republican divisions over the Libby affair have emerged among the party's presidential hopefuls. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney criticized the handling of the case but stopped short of backing a pardon.
Meanwhile, actor Fred Thompson, a former Tennessee senator and an undeclared candidate, said Libby ``absolutely'' should be pardoned. Thompson has lent his name to a lobbying campaign that's raising money on Libby's behalf. Arizona Senator John McCain and several others say it is premature to weigh in.
The candidate most strongly opposed to a pardon is former Virginia Governor James Gilmore, who's just a blip in the polls. ``The judicial process has worked its will,'' Gilmore said in an interview. ``To disrupt it is to undermine the law.'' Gilmore, a former state attorney general and chairman of the Republican National Committee, said many prosecutors share his sentiment.
Public Clamor
Public clamor for a president to grant clemency isn't unusual, said P.S. Ruckman Jr., a political science professor at Rock Valley Community College in Rockford, Illinois, and an expert on presidential pardons. He cited former Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower, who received ``millions of requests'' to spare the lives of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed for passing atomic secrets to the Soviet Union.
Bush and Cheney have so far said little about their intentions toward Libby. White House Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino said Bush ``felt terrible'' for Libby and his family.
Bush has granted fewer pardons -- 113 -- than any president in the past 100 years, while denying more than 1,000 requests, said Margaret Colgate Love, the Justice Department's pardon attorney from 1990 to 1997.
In addition, Bush has denied more than 4,000 commutation requests, and hundreds of requests for pardons and commutations are still pending, Love said.
Going Against Guidelines
A quick pardon for Libby would go against Justice Department guidelines, which recommend that a supplicant wait five years after conviction or release from confinement before seeking a pardon. On the other hand, there's no requirement that a president wait; President Gerald Ford pardoned his disgraced predecessor, Richard Nixon, shortly after taking office in 1974, and before Nixon was convicted of anything.
The focus on a Libby pardon is obscuring other options available to Bush, including conditional pardons, commutations, remissions of fines and amnesties, Ruckman said.
One possibility would be to issue a respite directive, which simply delays carrying out a sentence and lets passions cool, he said. George Washington first granted respites in June, 1795, delaying the executions of two men involved in the Whiskey Rebellion; they were later pardoned, Ruckman said.
``Bush can keep Libby out of jail without exercising a pardon,'' Ruckman said.
The Weird and Wonderful World of MIT’s Mad Scientist
read more | digg story
Don't want to see indie internet radio snuffed out? Protest this!
read more | digg story
Tax and Spend Liberals? Mr. C doesn’t think so…
read more | digg story
Unmaking History
read more | digg story
Bush May Be Out of Chances For a Lasting Domestic Victory
read more | digg story
ETERNAL WAR AND FALSE FLAG TERRORby Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD
read more | digg story
Top US judge calls for secret terror trials, racial profiling, and more
read more | digg story
Bush called out for his earmarks
read more | digg story
Reagan Deputy AG Calls for Cheney Impeachment
read more | digg story
If Bush Rejected Subpoena That Means All Americans Can Reject Subpoenas
Bush's attorney told Congress the White House would not turn over subpoenaed documents for former presidential counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor. Congressional panels want the documents for their investigations of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' stewardship of the Justice Department.
The Democratic chairmen of the two committees seeking the documents accused Bush of stonewalling and disdain for the law, and said they would press forward with enforcing the subpoenas.
"With respect, it is with much regret that we are forced down this unfortunate path which we sought to avoid by finding grounds for mutual accommodation," White House counsel Fred Fielding said in a letter to the chairmen of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees. "We had hoped this matter could conclude with your committees receiving information in lieu of having to invoke executive privilege. Instead, we are at this conclusion."
Thursday was the deadline for surrendering the documents. The White House also made clear that Miers and Taylor would not testify next month, as directed by the subpoenas, which were issued June 13. The stalemate could end up with House and Senate contempt citations and a battle in federal court over separation of powers.
"Increasingly, the president and vice president feel they are above the law," said Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. He portrayed the president's actions as "Nixonian stonewalling."
His House counterpart, Judiciary Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., said Bush's assertion of executive privilege was "unprecedented in its breadth and scope" and displayed "an appalling disregard for the right of the people to know what is going on in their government."
In his letter, Fielding said Bush had "attempted to chart a course of cooperation" by releasing more than 8,500 pages of documents and sending Gonzales and other senior officials to testify before Congress. The White House also had offered a compromise in which Miers, Taylor, White House political strategist Karl Rove and their deputies would be interviewed by Judiciary Committee aides in closed- door sessions, without transcripts.
Leahy and Conyers rejected that offer. Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, a member of the Judiciary Committee, said the Democrats should have accepted it.
"We would be much farther ahead in finding out whether there's any real impropriety here or not," said Hatch, a former chairman of the committee. He also said presidents have legitimate reasons to protect the confidentiality of the advice they get.
In his letter, Fielding explained Bush's position on executive privilege this way: "For the President to perform his constitutional duties, it is imperative that he receive candid and unfettered advice and that free and open discussions and deliberations occur among his advisors and between those advisors and others within and outside the Executive Branch."
This "bedrock presidential prerogative" exists, in part, to protect the president from being compelled to disclose such communications to Congress, Fielding argued. And he questioned whether the documents and testimony the committees seeking are critically important to their investigations.
It was the second time in his administration that Bush has exerted executive privilege, said White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto. The first instance was in December, 2001, to rebuff Congress' demands for Clinton administration documents.
Tensions between the administration and the Democratic-run Congress have been building for months as the House and Senate Judiciary panels have sought to probe the firings of eight federal prosecutors and the administration's program of warrantless eavesdropping. The investigations are part of the Democrats' efforts to hold the administration to account for the way it has conducted the war on terrorism since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Democrats say the firings of the prosecutors over the winter was an example of improper political influence. The White House says U.S. attorneys are political appointees who can be hired and fired for almost any reason.
Democrats and even some key Republicans have said that Gonzales should resign over the U.S. attorney dismissals, but he has steadfastly held his ground and Bush has backed him.
Just Wednesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed the White House and Vice President Dick Cheney's office, demanding documents pertaining to terrorism-era warrant-free eavesdropping.
Separately, that panel also is summoning Gonzales to discuss the program and an array of other matters—including the prosecutor firings—that have cost a half-dozen top Justice Department officials their jobs.
The Judiciary panels also subpoenaed the National Security Council. Leahy added that, like Conyers, he would consider pursuing contempt citations against those who refuse.
AUDIO: Seymour Hersh: 'Bush And Cheney’s Wet Dream Is Hitting Iran'
read more | digg story
National ID May Have Killed Immigration Bill
FDA ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ELIMINATE VITAMIN COMPANIES
By Byron J. Richards, CCN
June 27, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
The FDA, emboldened by its transformation into a drug company, has embarked upon an anti-American plan of interfering with business and intentionally eliminating various dietary supplement companies from the market. The FDA announcement came on Friday, June 22, 2007 under the guise of a final rule for dietary supplement good manufacturing practices (CGMPs). Within this 800 page rule the FDA states, “We find that this final rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.... Establishments with above average costs, and even establishments with average costs, could be hard pressed to continue to operate. Some of these may decide it is too costly and either change product lines or go out of business.... 140 very small [less than 20 employees] and 32 small dietary supplement manufacturers [less than 500 employees] will be at risk of going out of business.... costs per establishment are proportionally higher for very small than for large establishments....The regulatory costs of this final rule will also discourage new small businesses from entering the industry.”
This FDA rule will directly raise the price of dietary supplements for all consumers. The FDA acknowledges this and says “We expect that the majority of these costs will be borne by consumers of dietary supplements, who will likely respond to the increase in prices by reducing consumption.” Thus, the FDA is intentionally seeking to shrink the size of the dietary supplement industry and reduce the influence of safe and effective options to improve the dreadful trend in the health of Americans. The goal is to leave toxic drugs as the primary health option.
Independent analysis of this FDA rule has placed cost of compliance at 10 fold what the FDA estimates with as many as 50% of small companies unable to comply.
The gutless cowards of Congress, a majority of whom are on the Big Pharma payroll or will be on it once they leave Congress, have delegated their lawmaking powers granted by the U.S. Constitution to a bunch of Big Pharma-friendly unelected bureaucrats at the FDA, who are in turn using this power to undermine free commerce and help Big Pharma eliminate competition from the market. This is the behavior of a government in tyranny, inviting a revolution by the people. It is noteworthy that fascist governments of the past have eliminated health freedom and health options as a necessary condition to enslave and brainwash a population. Congress has delegated its responsibility to the people to such an extent that over half the laws in this country are now concocted by unelected bureaucrats with vested interests.
A Vehicle for Unprecedented Harassment
Any company that can afford to comply with the costs and regulations of this new FDA rule can be targeted and eliminated at will by the FDA. In essence, the FDA is seeking to make the dietary supplement industry document every phase of production, including expensive testing at multiple points in the production process. Massive recordkeeping will be required, including all customer complaints and returns for any reason! This is utterly draconian and unnecessary interference and burden to free commerce. It is completely Anti-American. No doubt, the FDA will impose user fees as an additional charge so that FDA agents will have the funding required to enforce the regulations. Under the new rule any flaw in bookkeeping can result in a company’s products being declared adulterated, allowing the FDA to remove them from the market even though nothing is wrong with them! A company can then be forced out of business because they won’t be able to sell any products to raise the money to comply. The rules are so complex and vague that the FDA can selectively target any company it chooses, even those attempting to comply in good faith.
The FDA is doing this under the pretense of improved consumer safety. Consumer safety could readily be guaranteed by simply having all companies test their final products for purity and potency. Instead of this simple approach the FDA has gone to the extreme of burdening the dietary supplement industry with regulations in excess of the drug industry! Supplements are foods, not drugs. The food industry couldn’t begin to comply with these FDA rules, even though food contamination is far more dangerous to health than dietary supplements.
The FDA intends to phase this rule in over the next three years. This means that within five years half the industry and many of the health options individuals rely on will either be gone or significantly more expensive.
Even more chilling is that forces within the dietary supplement industry itself are in no small part responsible for this FDA final rule.
Trade Groups and their Big Companies Turn on America
The Natural Products Association (formerly the National Nutritional Food Association – NNFA) and the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) have been instrumental in forcing these drug-like rules on dietary supplements. These globalist organizations are selling out America, destroying American jobs, undermining the U.S. Constitution, and working in conjunction with pharmaceutical companies to usher in Codex and the New World Order. Consumers of dietary supplements should learn who these companies are before buying their products and helping to inadvertently fund the destruction of health freedom in this country.
When DSHEA was passed in 1994 part of that law required the FDA to establish current good manufacturing practices (CGMPs) for the dietary supplement industry. During a period of FDA outreach to the industry the FDA was surprised to learn that CRN and NPA were in favor of drug-like CGMPs for the dietary supplement industry. These trade groups, working closely with Senators Orin Hatch (R-UT) and Tom Harkin (D-IA), have intentionally taken the supplement industry down a slippery slope. It is noteworthy that Hatch takes in more money from Big Pharma than he does from dietary supplement companies. Not only is Hatch a big supporter of the Medicare Part D drug rip off of Americans he has saved Big Pharma billions by protecting them from generic competition, as he is currently attempting to do with his legislation for new biologic drugs. Hatch also has a son working for NPA and another son that lobbies for NPA and the dietary supplement industry. When Hatch leaves the Senate he will be first in line for a six or seven figure Big Pharma salary.
The CRN has been taken over by multinational drug and food companies. Key players are the nutritional divisions of Bayer, BASF, Cargill, Monsanto, Wyeth, and Archer Daniels Midland. Nutrition companies that participate are in most cases owned by pharmaceutical companies, heavily invested in pharmaceutical companies, or jockeying for position in the international market as part of the New World Order. Key names include Mannatech, Shaklee, Herbalife, GNLD International, The Vitamin Shoppe, and GNC. These companies are glad to eliminate competition from small companies and start up ventures.
Carrying on the general theme of Big Pharma ownership and a globalist agenda are the companies that control the NPA. One need only look at the new NPA China board to understand who these key players are. Jarrow Formulas, Now Foods, GNC, and Herbalife top the list. At the end of 2006 Jarrow and Now helped lead the charge with Senators Hatch and Harkin to burden the dietary supplement industry with bizarre Adverse Event Reporting legislation (AER) which insisted that dietary supplement companies keep extensive records on any type of consumer complaint. Aspects of this AER law are now implemented in the FDA final rule on CGMPs. Of course, NPA was quick to offer expensive training to its members to indoctrinate them into how to comply with the rules that NPA, working on behalf of the FDA, just forced on its own members. Are their member companies really this stupid? Or are they all working together? I would recommend that any NPA member that believes itself to be a true American company that values our constitution immediately withdraw from NPA membership – consumers will be looking to see who you are.
The picture is now crystal clear for any person who cares to look. Numerous dietary supplement companies are anti-American and actively selling out our country and our constitution, working hand-in-glove with the FDA and Big Pharma. The majority of such companies can be found as members of CRN and NPA. It will be up to the American consumer to save the dietary industry from itself and preserve their own access to safe and effective natural health remedies. This is a relatively simple task. Quit buying products from or quit being a distributor in these fascist organizations. Support the small companies that are the backbone of America, otherwise they will soon be extinct.
Senator: Immigration calls crashed Capitol phone system
During a speech on the Senate floor, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., just said the phone system on Capitol Hill crashed because of all the calls they're receiving about the immigration bill.
USA TODAY's Kathy Kiely is on the case. We'll have more details in a few minutes.
Update at 10:34 a.m. ET: We're having trouble confirming this report because we keep getting a busy signal when we call the switchboard and other offices at the Capitol.
Update at 11:40 a.m. ET: The bill died in the Senate.
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Impeach Cheney now
read more | digg story
Report : Pentagon Can't Account For $19 Billion Spent On Iraqi Forces
read more | digg story
White House refuses to comply with subpoenas
read more | digg story
BREAKING: White House refuses to answer subpoenas
read more | digg story
D.C. Madam reveals name of Cheney in radio interview
WTF?! Pentagon Can't Account For $19 Billion Spent On Iraqi Forces
read more | digg story
What Do the Cheney Controversy and Other Bush Scandals Really Mean?
read more | digg story
Low Approval Rating - Congress Gets Raise?
read more | digg story
Iraqis figure out how to manipulate US government - hire more lobbyists
read more | digg story
Giuliani: Stay Scared
read more | digg story
No company has profited more from the carnage in Iraq than Halliburton
read more | digg story
Daily Show Viewers Know More About Current Events Than Fox News Fans
read more | digg story
The Internet is Blowing Apart The Political Landscape
read more | digg story
Make Federal Spending Transparent
read more | digg story
New investigation will target Gonzales' role in Cheney oversight dodge
read more | digg story
White House may force Congress to charge president w/ criminal charges
read more | digg story
Panel pushes for files on spy program - The Boston Globe
read more | digg story
White House refuses to answer subpoenas.
read more | digg story
American Education in Crisis
read more | digg story
White House exerts executive privilege on documents
read more | digg story
The Push to Restore Habeas Corpus
read more | digg story
Grand Theft Country: How George W. Bush Looted Iraq
read more | digg story
Senate takes step away from Real ID - CNET News.com
read more | digg story
Eureka! Letters praising Bush are like gold nuggets
read more | digg story
US to enter WAR THIS SUMMER as predicted by Israeli Intelligence Chief
read more | digg story
NRA Takes Aim at Gun-Control Democrats
read more | digg story
Not this Immigration Bill
read more | digg story
Internet Radio Holds Out Silent Hope
read more | digg story
Ron Paul: "The Honest Mechanic"
read more | digg story
Impeach him
read more | digg story
Poll: Government Funding of Faith-Based Discrimination
read more | digg story
U.S. image plunges in global survey
read more | digg story
ACTION ALERT: STOP AMNESTY!
Amnesty: The Plan To Destroy The USA What is happening to the United States of American under the leadership of the Sellout Senate, the White House and its likely mirror image of support in the Open Border Democratic House of Representatives should spark immediate anger and action from all Americans. |
Iran, Syria Prepare Hezbollah for New War with Israel
read more | digg story
Elizabeth Edwards: Why I called Ann Coulter
read more | digg story
Former Bush Official Going to Jail
read more | digg story
House gives itself a raise -- This is BULLSHIT
The cost-of-living raise gets lawmakers back on track for automatic pay raises after a fight between Democrats and Republicans last year and again in January killed the pay hike due this year. That was the first interruption of the annual congressional pay hike in seven years.
The blowup came after Democrats last year fulfilled a campaign promise to deny themselves a pay hike until Congress raised the minimum wage. Delays in the minimum wage bill cost every lawmaker about $3,100 this year.
On a 244-181 vote Wednesday, Democrats and Republicans alike killed a bid by Reps. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, and Lee Terry, R-Nebraska, to get a direct vote to block the annual increase, which is automatically awarded unless lawmakers vote to block it. The Senate has not indicated when it will deal with a similar measure.
As part of an ethics reform bill in 1989, Congress gave up its ability to accept pay for speeches and made annual cost-of-living pay increases automatic unless the lawmakers voted otherwise.
In the early days of GOP control of Congress, lawmakers routinely denied themselves the annual increase.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, and Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Missouri, worked to smooth the way for the pay hike.
Typically, the annual vote on the pay hike comes on an obscure procedural move -- instead of a direct up-or-down vote -- and the Democratic and GOP whips each delivered a roughly equal number of votes to shut off any move to block the pay hike.
This year's vote was made ticklish by last year's battle. Republicans said Democrats broke a promise not to use the pay raise issue against GOP lawmakers in campaign ads and were, generally speaking, more reluctant to supply votes.
Hoyer and Blunt worked the floor during the vote to make sure there was relative balance between the parties in delivering votes. Finally, moments after signaling with three fingers a demand for a few more GOP votes, Hoyer drew his finger across his throat as a signal for Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-North Dakota, to gavel the tally to a close.
Most members support the pay raise as a means of retaining experienced lawmakers and of making sure that Congress is not simply dominated by wealthy people. Many lawmakers maintain homes both in the expensive Washington housing market and back in their districts. On most days, they meet with lobbyists making far more than they do.
"Every member has some obligation to the institution for the compensation to, as much as possible, keep pace with inflation," Blunt told reporters Wednesday. "I think this should be as good of a job when I leave it as it was when I took it."
"I don't think this is the right time for members of Congress to be allowing the pay raise to go through without even an up-or-down vote," said Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah. "We need to show the American people we are willing to make some sacrifices ... that we recognize there's a struggle for some in today's economy."
The exact figure for this year's increase has not been settled under a complicated formula that awards lawmakers a smaller pay hike than civil servants. But opponents estimated a pay hike this year of 2.7 percent, or $4,460.
Both House members and senators presently make $165,200 a year, with a handful of leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, earning more.
The pay raise would also apply to the vice president -- who is president of the Senate -- congressional leaders and Supreme Court justices.
This year, Vice President Dick Cheney, Pelosi and Chief Justice John Roberts receive $212,100. Associate justices receive $203,000. House and Senate party leaders get $183,500.
President Bush's salary of $400,000 is unaffected by the legislation.
CAUGHT ON TAPE: Cheney Says VP's Office An 'Important Part' Of Exec. Branch
read more | digg story
FTC shoots down Net Neutrality, says it is not needed
read more | digg story
RIAA Gestapo Tactics
Ok, I actually do believe that pirating music is wrong, but I've never agreed with nor approved of the RIAA's ham-fisted approach. And now, when they couldn't nail a disabled single mom, they went after her 10-year old son, going so far as to pose as the kid's grandmother in a phone call to his school!
Read More
Ron Paul: How a Fringe Politician Took Over the Web
read more | digg story
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
A First! The Fed As a Presidential Campaign Issue
read more | digg story
Tancredo sends head of lettuce to Chertoff
read more | digg story
Cheney forced out former EPA chief
read more | digg story
Ron Paul on the TERRY ANDERSON RADIO SHOW
read more | digg story
Bush talks long-term stay in Iraq and more troops die
read more | digg story
Ron Paul on CBS' website - AP Report on Iowa forum
read more | digg story
Bush, Cheney and the Nixon Principle
read more | digg story
Bush Slips Up About Amnesty Bill; Administration Panics
read more | digg story
Republican Support for Iraq War Fading Dramatically
read more | digg story
How did the Bush administration use its secret eavesdropping powers?
read more | digg story
Ron Paul interview with Mancow June 26, 2007
read more | digg story
Conservative Idaho protests Alberto Gonzales!
read more | digg story
Organized Crime: It's OK If It's the Government
read more | digg story
Federal bill would rob poor, benefit corporations
read more | digg story
Group shows FEMA anticipated Katrina's destruction of New Orleans
read more | digg story
Purdue 9/11 simulation exposed as fraud: Media covers up hoax and conceals
read more | digg story
LAW of Unintended consequences of globalization, "alQaeda"
read more | digg story
White House, Cheney's office, SUBPOENAED
read more | digg story
Report: ‘Shadow Goverment’ Of Private Contractors Explodes
read more | digg story
Americans kids are dying because China is knowingly making faulty products.
read more | digg story
Democrats determined to force over 200 million US wage slaves to register.
read more | digg story
White House lying, top Democrat says
read more | digg story
Holding America Hostage - Bush Won't Protect Nation Without Amnesty
read more | digg story
Our Violent Men In Blue
read more | digg story
Warning over nuclear black market
read more | digg story
Congressman seeks to cut funding for Cheney's office, home
read more | digg story
Bush’s Offices Reportedly Refused Probe
From LA Times
An oversight agency’s effort in 2005 to inspect the president’s offices over suspected leaks was rebuffed, Rep. Waxman says.
By Josh Meyer
A federal watchdog agency planned to inspect the president’s executive offices in the White House in 2005 for evidence of suspected leaks of classified information, but it was rebuffed by Bush administration officials, congressional investigators have been told.
The report of the White House’s refusal to be inspected comes amid criticism from congressional Democrats of how President Bush signed an executive order requiring federal agencies to submit to independent oversight of their handling of classified information, but did not enforce it for his office or that of Vice President Dick Cheney.
The blocked inspection was described in an April 23 letter to former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card from Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles), who provided a copy of the letter to the Los Angeles Times on Monday.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino told reporters Monday that the president considered his office and that of the vice president exempt from his directive. The 2003 executive order addressed a system of safeguards for government agencies aimed at ensuring that classified national security information is properly handled so it doesn’t fall into the wrong hands, that improper leaks of such information are investigated promptly, and that government secrets are properly declassified at the appropriate time.
Read More Probe
Senators unaware of Immigration bill tied to SPP
read more | digg story
Daily Show humor: Cheney claims he's member of Supreme Court
read more | digg story
Giuliani discouraged use of respirators by WTC workers
read more | digg story
INN interviews candidate Ron Paul
read more | digg story
Cheney’s office abandons novel argument
read more | digg story
Demand that Nancy Pelosi calls for Cheney's Impeachment! BAE Scandal!
read more | digg story
Ron Paul on Attack of the Show
read more | digg story
Giuliani Acknowledged Explosions on 9/11, Did not Believe Gas Related
read more | digg story
Cheney May Meet his Match in Democratic Rep. Emanuel
read more | digg story
MSM Stooge "Outs" Law-Abiding Citizens
And what, exactly, is the crime of legally owning a gun, Matt Westerhold?
Can't seem to think of one, but the staff of this newspaper sees a "crime" being committed.
I see an invasion of privacy, a class-action lawsuit and customer backlash, but that's just me.
Also interesting how the moronic editor cites a "right to know," as if legal gun owners are comparable to child molesters/sexual predators.
Note to Democrat activists journalists of the world: In addition to the 1st Amendment, there is also a 2nd Amendment in that Constitution that you claim to have read. We know these registries are a matter of public record. The problem, of course, is discretion. As Jeff Goldblum said in Jurassic Park, they were so obsessed with the idea that they could that they never stopped to think if they should. And in this case, what is the urgency and public interest served in "outing" private citizens who aren't breaking any laws?
I'm sure they'd give the same kind of treatment to law-breaking illegal aliens if they knew where they were working and living. These journalists are 'patriots.'
If you want to call Sandusky Register editor Matt Westerhold and let them know how you feel about their assault on the privacy and safety of legal gun owners, fell free.
Matt Westerhold
419-609-5866
mattwesterhold@sanduskyregister.com
Doug Phares, Publisher
419-609-5860
dougphares@sanduskyregister.com
This is a blatant abuse of what newspapers claim to do, and it is unfortunately all too common in the leftwing press. First they came for the gun owners - who knows what legal, law-abiding citizens they'll come after next.
Brothels legal in Iraq's Green Zone
Bush: Maybe U.S. Military 'Just Not Very Good'
read more | digg story
FLASHBACK: Cheney Argued Energy Probe ‘Interfered With Executive Branch'
read more | digg story
Tancredo Calls for Rep. Paul to be Included in Iowa Presidential Forum
read more | digg story
ABC News asks: Is Cheney too powerful?
read more | digg story
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
GOP To Bush: Time's Up On Iraq War
read more | digg story
BREAKING VIDEO: Ron Paul on Neil Cavuto with Guns a Blazing
read more | digg story
Republicans reignite debate on war
read more | digg story
Ex-governor says he was target of Republican plot - Los Angeles Times
read more | digg story
Anthony D. Romero: Today's Day of Action: A Public Outcry to Save the Const
read more | digg story
Norman Mineta Confirms Dick Cheney Ordered Military Stand-Down On 9/11/'01
read more | digg story
Waxman Reveals Numerous New Security Violations, Threatens Subpoenas
read more | digg story
11-24-2024
Lindsey Graham Tells Allies ‘We’re Gonna Crush Your Economy’ if They Arrest Netanyahu for War Crimes
-
FLASHBACK: Kremlin to Pitch New Currency... BEIJING TO PITCH NEW GLOBAL CURRENCY; DUMP DOLLAR OBAMA TO THE RESCUE! PLAYS HIS $1 ...
-
"Multiple indications of vote fraud are beginning to pop up regarding the New Hampshire primary elections. Roughly 80% of New Hampshire...
-
Here Are 4 Facts From Democratic Memo That Destroy Trump’s FBI Conspiracy Democratic Memo Missouri governor to be investigated by a spec...