The attacks against Tesla and Musk are inside jobs to grant him more power.
The government does not discriminate against left wing and right wing protests. It sees them for what they are, threats against the order. The feds have a history of sabotaging protests to use them as excuses to give themselves more power. During BLM, they conveniently left piles of bricks along protest pathways to incite violence. They intertwined themselves in the January 6 crowd to spread hostility. Both of these had the same goals:
Dissuade future protests: Not many people want to affiliate with an unjust violent crowd. The more agressive a protest, the more excuses cops have to arrest and harm the protestors. Both of these work in tandem to discourage others from joining the movement.
Create division: Violence in protests are exaggerated and put on display by the media to keep the lower classes infighting. Having us argue over things like "Wow! The (Democrats/Republicans) are burning buildings down!" while completely forgetting what the original point of the protests were.
Exert power: The government would love to silence every protestor, however realize the obvious ramifications that come with arresting innocent people. They're solution? Make them not innocent. Label them domestic terrorists, and fear monger the public into thinking that more police, spyware, and surveillance cameras are for their own safety.
I believe these Tesla attacks and the X DDOS are being heavily encouraged, it not outright done by federal officers for the benefit of Elon and the current administration as a whole. It's no coincidence that Ukraine was immediately blamed for the DDOS as they are trying to sever all ties with them, and that today Trump is touting a new Tesla he bought as a counter protest.
Chinese cash flows into Musk ventures raise US security alarms.
Elon Musk's real sugar daddies.
Elon has held many secret meetings with Putin. He has to come when summoned because Putin is in position to put him out of business in Russia. Xi, in China, also holds considerable leverage over the billionaire oligarch because he could stomp out the egomaniacal twerp on nothing but a whim.
Yet no one questions why Trump ( who also held secret meetings with Putin and refused to release the minutes of those meetings) empowered a man so easily compromised.
One might question the real reason so much havoc is coming out of the White House. Is it to save money as it is claimed, or could there be more obvious, treacherous and treasonous motives at play?
Just askin'.
Story by MZUG • 56m • 2 min read
Chinese Money in Musk's Empire: How is Beijing Financing American Technologies?
Chinese investors secretly acquire stakes in Elon Musk's private companies using unique financial mechanisms that hide their identities. Although legal, these investments raise concerns about Beijing's influence, especially since Musk plays a crucial role in American politics, reports the Financial Times. Chinese investors are quietly placing tens of millions of dollars in Elon Musk's private companies, such as SpaceX, xAI, and Neuralink. They use special financial structures known as special-purpose vehicles (SPVs), which allow them to remain anonymous and avoid restrictions from U.S. authorities.
Investments intensified after Musk became a close advisor to President Donald Trump, and his companies secured key government contracts.
Chinese investors cannot directly buy shares in U.S. technology and defense sector companies. Therefore, funds are placed in Cayman Islands-registered vehicles, which then invest in American private equity that holds shares in Musk's companies. Sources disclosed to the Financial Times that asset managers reassure investors these structures allow them to bypass scrutiny.
According to experts, Chinese capital in Musk's companies amounts to at least $30 million over the last two years. The influx of Chinese funds raises concerns, especially given Musk's access to U.S. government secret projects and his contracts with the Pentagon.
Musk himself has maintained good relations with Beijing for years. In 2019, he launched a massive Tesla factory in Shanghai, which relies on Chinese supply chains.
SpaceX, which has significantly increased its valuation in recent years, is the biggest draw for Chinese investors.
War is usually not in interest of the people: it serves only the interests of the ruling elite
Autocratic countries are more likely to go to war because they are less likely to care about the interests of the people, then democracies. But another theory is that democracies and autocracies are politically more stable, than the countries that are in between. Well now USA is in between as an autocratic democracy.
But countries governed by the people are more likely to compromise and negotiate a peaceful solution. But the other side need also be governed by the people, to reach a peaceful settlement. But all I mentioned are just theories which I read about in books. And the two theories contradict each other.
So what are the chances of an international war? What are the chances of a global war? According to theory, since China and Russia are autocratic, they 1. Should be stable 2. More likely to go to war. And USA is possibly likely to go to war as an autocratic democracy.
It has been explained that Canada and Australia were peacefully able to leave the British Empire, while USA fought for its independence. Why could they not compromise and negotiate a peaceful agreement? Maybe my own theory, both sides thought they could win. They both wanted land and wealth. The US ruling elite, and the British ruling elite.
So there is also a principal agent problem. Where the principal are the people, and the agents are the ruling elite. In case of the American revolution the ruling elite wanted land and wealth, and maybe power, and sold it to the people as independence. Of course the official reason was also taxation without representation. The agents don't serve the interests of the people.
Why does Pakistan keep going to war against India? A way for the military to justify itself and hold on to power? Why does China threaten Taiwan? Is it really going to benefit the people, to risk world war and international isolation, for a little bit of land and wealth?
The true reasons for war are not usually discussed openly. It is a conspiracy of the ruling elite. Was the American second Iraq war justified? How does Russia sell its invasion of Ukraine to the people? Everyone has secrets, or 'open' secrets, and they conspire with others to keep it out of the public mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment