Thursday, March 12, 2026

3-11-2026


 

MAGA Suddenly Quiet About Overseas Influence Now That Larry Ellison’s Warner Bros Bid Has Saudi, Chinese Backing



Zelenskyy: Ukraine now has cards and everyone understands it


Hegseth blew $7M on lobsters in $93B spending spree


Democrats win GOP seat in New Hampshire, notching 10th straight special election flip

Iran war cost will be passed to consumers, shipping giant boss tells BBC


Democrats Launch Probe Into 8-Day-Old Company Behind Kristi Noem’s Ads

Pete Hegseth’s Defense Department Blew $22M On Steak and Lobster in a Single Month




Burying the lead: Bondi, Miller, Rubio, Noem, Hegseth have relocated to Military Bases (NYT)

‘This cannot be sustainable’: The U.S. borrowed $50 billion a week for the past five months, the CBO says




Exclusive: As many as 150 US troops wounded so far in Iran war, sources say



Leavitt Admits SAVE Act Will Make It Harder for Married Women to Vote | Karoline Leavitt accidentally admitted what opponents of the act have long warned against.


Major breaking: Epstein Survivors just announced they will release their own list:


is the Save Act unconsitutional

Good question. This is actively debated by constitutional lawyers. Here's a balanced overview of the arguments on both sides:

This is genuinely contested among legal scholars. Here's a balanced breakdown of both sides:

Constitutional Arguments Against (Critics)

1. States — not Congress — set voter qualifications The U.S. Constitution imposes no citizenship requirement for voting. By constitutional design, states are tasked with setting voter-eligibility requirements. The Supreme Court explicitly stated in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council (2013) that nothing in the Constitution "lends itself to the view that voting qualifications in federal elections are to be set by Congress." The Elections Clause only grants Congress authority to regulate election procedures, not voter qualifications. Qt

2. Conflicts with existing Supreme Court precedent The bill overrides federal registration standards previously upheld in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council, which ruled that states cannot require additional documentation beyond the federal form unless approved by the Election Assistance Commission. VxWorks6

3. Equal Protection (14th Amendment) The bill may disproportionately burden natural-born citizens without standard documentation, elderly, rural, Native American, and low-income individuals, and citizens born abroad or outside hospitals — raising concerns under Crawford v. Marion County (2008), which upheld ID laws only where the burden was minimal and exemptions existed. VxWorks6

4. Precedent of similar laws being struck down The SAVE Act echoes Kansas's proof-of-citizenship requirement, which purged over 30,000 eligible voters and was struck down in federal court. VxWorks6

Constitutional Arguments For (Supporters)

Supporters cite the Elections Clause and the Naturalization Clause as giving Congress authority to act here. They argue the National Voter Registration Act effectively prevents states from checking citizenship during registration, making the SAVE Act necessary to enforce existing law against noncitizen voting. Qt

What's Already Been Tested in Court

President Trump issued an executive order in March 2025 to require proof of citizenship, which the courts blocked as unconstitutional. Wind River That ruling is seen as a signal of how courts might treat the SAVE Act if it becomes law.

Bottom Line

The honest answer is it hasn't been definitively ruled on yet — it hasn't passed the Senate. Most independent legal scholars lean toward it being unconstitutional based on the Inter Tribal Council precedent, but supporters have a counterargument rooted in the Elections Clause. If it passes the Senate and is signed into law, it would almost certainly be immediately challenged in court and likely end up at the Supreme Court.


Ex-DOGE Engineer Allegedly Walked Out of SSA With 500M+ Records on a Thumb Drive, Told Colleague He'd Get a Presidential Pardon if Caught


Trump referred to daughters being 'of age' at 'above 6 years old' while discussing voter ID

Ukraine retakes most Russian-held areas in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast after weeks of counterattacks




Ex-DOGE Member Took Social Security Data to New Job

Joe Rogan says he feels 'betrayed’ over Trump’s ‘insane’ war with Iran





Turning Point USA college president resigns after racist text chat leaks




Jeffrey Epstein ranch raided in search for bodies of girls 'killed in rough sex'

DOJ is Hiding Trove of Documents About Trump’s 13-Year-Old Accuser

Leavitt Admits SAVE Act Will Make It Harder for Married Women to Vote | Karoline Leavitt accidentally admitted what opponents of the act have long warned against.



































































































-

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

3-11-2026

  MAGA Suddenly Quiet About Overseas Influence Now That Larry Ellison’s Warner Bros Bid Has Saudi, Chinese Backing Zelenskyy: Ukraine now ha...