The Great Dormancy Era resents a future, an era where stagnation, societal decline, and an inexorable descent into a regressed and feudal existence take hold of humanity by turning them into warring tribes and smaller factions that will have a serious impact on society and stability.
This ominous period is not a singular event but a gradual, terrifying shift that could unfold over the next several decades to a century, it is a time in which the very foundations of innovation, technology, and society crumble under the weight of economic ruin, political chaos, and technological regression.
Technological Stagnation: The Eclipse of Innovation
Projections: 2050–2080
As the Great Dormancy Era begins, the rapid pace of technological advancement that has marked the modern era grinds to a halt.
The innovative spirit that once fueled progress across sectors such as medicine, energy, transportation, and artificial intelligence, will falter due to a convergence of financial instability, resource scarcity, and the loss of intellectual and political capital.
In the face of widespread financial ruin, research institutions, and tech giants will struggle to maintain the infrastructure necessary for groundbreaking work, and resources, once dedicated to pioneering fields like quantum computing or space exploration will be diverted to basic survival, leaving only fragments of what was once possible.
Electricity may still flow, but it will be limited, rationed, and decentralized as power grids, once a marvel of human engineering, will begin to break down as maintenance becomes more sporadic, and the necessary materials to repair them dwindle.
The internet, a vital part of modern society, will become a mere shadow of its former self as the bandwidth will be throttled, speeds will decrease dramatically, and access will become a privilege for the few, rather than a ubiquitous service.
In this period of technological stagnation, the promise of a world driven by AI, space exploration, and cutting-edge medical breakthroughs will remain a distant, unreachable dream as technology dwindles under pressure from the government and the control of CEOs making it hard for the market to compete with the times.
Famine and Starvation: The Collapse of Global Agriculture
Projections: 2035–2060
The underlying cause of the Great Dormancy Era is not just social or political decay but also the collapse of agricultural systems, exacerbated by climate change, resource depletion, and unsustainable farming practices.
Food scarcity will become the norm rather than the exception as weather patterns become increasingly unpredictable and arable land becomes less fertile because of a lack of rainwater, proper irrigation, and other means would create the Dust Bowl again which will lead millions to starve to death and displaced.
By the middle of this century, millions, if not billions, will face hunger and malnutrition on an unprecedented scale as agricultural output will plummet, and global trade systems, already under strain will crumble under the pressure of transportation failures and international conflicts over dwindling resources.
A combination of poor crop yields, water shortages, and the disintegration of global supply chains will lead to widespread starvation, localized famines may occur as regions fight for control over the remaining resources, while governments that once promised food security collapse under the weight of their failure to deliver.
The nightmare of food-deprived humanity will lead to the rise of new social classes consisting of the elite hoarders, the desperate masses, and the warlords who control access to food, water, electricity, and other means of life would be rationed or controlled by these governments as the rich in their ivory towers look down on the warring tribes with a sick pleasure and disgust at the mere sight of these primitives.
Civil Unrest and Revolution: The Disintegration of Society
Projections: 2040–2070
With famine comes social unrest, the technological and economic systems begin to unravel, and populations will demand answers and justice, governments will be too weak to handle the mounting pressure from mass protests to full-blown revolutions, the fabric of nations will be torn apart, in the face of starvation, inequality, and crumbling social services, anger and frustration will transform into violent upheaval.
The Great Dormancy Era will witness the fall of democratic systems, as governments become more authoritarian, attempting to maintain order through brutal force, corruption, genocide, and inefficiency, and the erosion of public trust will fuel massive civil unrest, and in time, new power structures will emerge, often violent, often chaotic.
In many cases, revolutions will result in fragmented states, where regional leaders or warlords take control of small territories, nations will become fractured, unable to unite against a common enemy, and others will slip into outright civil war.
The centralized action of power in a few corrupt elites will exacerbate inequalities, creating pockets of extreme wealth and vast regions of destitution as local representation is abolished and tribal councils reign supreme people will begin to live in tribes and other societies becoming isolated by different cultural and social customs as well as being ruled by a leader with an iron fist.
Financial Ruin: The Shattering of Global Economies
Projections: 2035–2045
As the world plunges into a series of crises, climate change, resource scarcity, and political instability, the global economy will collapse, and the Great Dormancy Era will be marked by a long period of financial ruin, as markets crash, currencies lose their value, and unemployment reaches unprecedented levels.
Trade will slow, industries will fold, nations will spiral into debt and the wealth gap will widen as the few remaining rich elites cling to power while the masses sink into poverty, famine, financial ruin, and other crises that will exacerbate the already volatile morale of people.
Without the means to fuel innovation or manage the basic needs of society, the global economy will enter a state of decline from which recovery seems impossible, and financial systems that once drove technological advances and social prosperity will atrophy, leaving behind only the scars of failed policies and fractured institutions.
The global financial system will retreat into localized barter economies once globalized supply chains that allow for rapid distribution of goods will splinter, leading to a return to localized markets, but with far fewer goods available.
Tribalism: The Return to the Dark Ages
Projections: 2060–2090
As the social structure decays and centralized governments lose their authority, the fabric of modern society will begin to tear, giving rise to smaller, more isolated groups that form based on local resources, religion, or shared ideologies.
The fragmented world will see the resurgence of tribalism, once thought of as a relic of a distant past, now the defining characteristic of human interaction, and these tribes may resemble pre-industrial societies, relying on primitive agricultural methods, rudimentary craftsmanship, and basic survival strategies.
In a world without functioning governments, these tribal groups will often compete for resources, leading to clashes over food, water, and shelter, warfare between competing factions will be common, and the concept of “national borders” will become obsolete.
A culture of fear and distrust will permeate the world. People will turn inward, abandoning global cooperation in favor of protectionism, localism, and extreme isolationism, these tribal communities, often based on bloodlines or ideologies, will form their own localized economies, governances, and social structures, but these will frequently break down into internal conflict.
The Decline of Government: The Crumbling of Authority
Projections: 2030–2060
As global crises intensify, government institutions will lose their ability to function effectively during the Great Dormancy Era will see the decline of centralized power structures as governments become overwhelmed by multiple, simultaneous challenges.
Corruption, inefficiency, and civil unrest will further weaken political institutions, leading to widespread disillusionment among the masses as trust in political leaders fades, new forms of governance may emerge.
Local governments might rise to prominence, but they will often be authoritarian in nature, seeking to control dwindling resources by any means necessary, over time, these smaller states may merge into feudalistic systems that resemble medieval and feudal era hereditary rulers, self-sufficient fiefdoms, and serfs working the land.
Public services like healthcare, education, and social security will fall apart as governments no longer maintain them, the social contract that once held societies together will break down, and citizens will become more reliant on local, informal support structures rather than formal state institutions.
The Seven Supreme Oligarchs
The term "Seven Supreme Oligarchs" refers to a hypothetical group of powerful and influential individuals who hold significant control over global industries, economies, and technologies, contributing to systemic inequality and societal decline.
These oligarchs are often seen as representatives of the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few individuals or corporate entities, in the context of the "Great Dormancy Era" scenario, they are individuals whose actions, business practices, and ideologies are seen as exacerbating the conditions that lead to societal collapse, stagnation, and chaos.
The term "oligarch" itself refers to a member of a small, elite group that holds significant power or control over a particular sphere, often with little regard for democratic processes or public welfare, as these individuals or families usually acquire wealth and power through business ventures, investments, or political influence, which they leverage to maintain their dominance.
In the context of the Seven Supreme Oligarchs, the term is used to describe a modern, corporate elite whose wealth and power allow them to shape global trends and policies.
Elon Musk (Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter) Accusations: Musk has been praised for his work in advancing electric vehicles and space exploration, but his companies also face criticism for monopolistic tendencies.
Tesla’s dominance in electric vehicles has made it a key player in the transition to renewable energy, but the company’s reliance on lithium-ion batteries has contributed to environmental degradation through mining practices.
Labor Practices:** Musk’s companies have been accused of poor working conditions, wage suppression, and anti-union practices, reflecting broader issues of wealth concentration, corporate control, and the erosion of worker rights, problems that could become more pronounced during periods of economic collapse or stagnation.
Criticism: His pursuit of technological innovation, while admirable, has sometimes led to short-term decision-making focused on profitability over sustainability, and the consolidation of wealth within a single figure could exacerbate economic inequality and social unrest in the future.
Jeff Bezos (Amazon)
Accusations: Amazon has revolutionized the retail industry, but it has also been accused of exploiting workers in its warehouses and creating a business model that decimates local businesses, erodes traditional industries, and contributes to the gig economy's exploitation, this creates a wealth divide between the corporate elite and working-class citizens.
Bezos has built a company that controls a massive portion of global commerce. Critics argue that Amazon’s influence has led to the homogenization of economies, encouraging practices that lead to environmental degradation, waste, and the disappearance of local, sustainable economies.
Criticism: Amazon’s reliance on automation, extreme cost-cutting, and relentless growth could lead to economic models that benefit a few while rendering vast populations obsolete or disenfranchised in the future.
Mark Zuckerberg (Meta/Facebook) Accusations: Facebook and its successor platforms (like Instagram and WhatsApp) have been accused of enabling misinformation, amplifying extremism, and eroding trust in democratic institutions.
The platform’s addictive algorithms have contributed to social fragmentation, fostering political polarization and societal distrust, which could lead to civil unrest or the breakdown of societal cohesion.
Meta’s handling of user data has sparked controversy over privacy violations, leading to concerns about surveillance capitalism—an economic model that benefits from the widespread exploitation of personal data at the expense of individual freedoms.
Criticism: Zuckerberg's companies, despite advancing the digital economy, have accelerated societal fragmentation, undermined democratic processes, and contributed to an erosion of privacy rights, which could play a key role in the social collapse seen in the Great Dormancy scenario.
Larry Page (Google)
Accusations: Google has long been criticized for dominating the search engine and online advertising markets, leading to a monopolistic hold over vast amounts of data.
This power has raised concerns about the manipulation of information, control over knowledge dissemination, and the potential for the erosion of competition.
Google’s influence on governmental policy, especially regarding privacy, data rights, and antitrust regulation, has been criticized as contributing to a corporatocracy, where large corporations wield more power than democratic governments.
Criticism: The centralization of data and information through Google has led to debates about monopolistic practices, contributing to a world where a few companies control vast swathes of knowledge, potentially undermining independent thought and exacerbating global inequality.
Peter Thiel (PayPal, Palantir, Founders Fund)
Accusations: Peter Thiel has often been described as a key architect of the “techno-oligarchy,” a term referring to the concentration of wealth and political influence among the tech elite. His investments in companies like Palantir, which is known for its surveillance capabilities, have raised concerns about privacy violations and the growing power of private entities in the control of data.
Thiel has been linked to supporting controversial political movements, including the backing of candidates with authoritarian tendencies.
His libertarian ideologies, while promoting technological innovation, could also reinforce systems that prioritize elite control over public welfare.
Criticism: Thiel’s ventures have been accused of contributing to the increasing concentration of power in the hands of a few, creating the groundwork for a future where the wealthy elite control vast swathes of the economy and technology, further driving the dystopian collapse of democratic systems.
Warren Buffet (Berkshire Hathaway)
Accusations: Warren Buffet has long been praised as a financial genius, but his accumulation of vast wealth has made him a symbol of capitalism’s failure to address economic inequality.
His investments in industries like railroads and energy have been linked to environmental degradation and the perpetuation of unsustainable practices that harm the planet in the long run.
Buffett’s investment strategies often prioritize short-term gains and financialization over long-term growth, leading to the growth of speculative economies that destabilize financial systems and contribute to economic cycles that can lead to collapse.
Criticism: Buffett is seen as part of a broader system of financialization and wealth concentration that drives inequality, destabilizes economies and contributes to the eventual stagnation and collapse of societies.
Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan Chase)
Accusations: As the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, Dimon has overseen one of the largest banks in the world, which has been repeatedly accused of exploiting financial markets, contributing to economic crises, and fueling the rise of “too big to fail” institutions that require taxpayer bailouts. JPMorgan Chase’s role in financial deregulation and speculative lending practices before the 2008 financial crisis has cemented Dimon’s reputation as a key figure in the global financial system’s instability.
Dimon’s aggressive risk-taking strategies, particularly before the 2008 financial crash, have been blamed for contributing to the collapse of the global financial system, a key moment in modern economic history that accelerated the financial stagnation many argue has contributed to societal stagnation.
Criticism: Dimon’s leadership has been seen as a key example of financial elites pursuing profit at the cost of global stability, which could lead to greater economic and social disintegration, as seen in the Great Dormancy Era.
Conclusion:
While these individuals have been at the forefront of technological, financial, and social change, their actions and business practices have also attracted significant criticism for contributing to the structural issues that could lead to a future of stagnation, inequality, and societal collapse.
Whether through monopolistic practices, environmental degradation, political manipulation, or the exploitation of labor and resources, their influence over global systems has been substantial, and some argue they may be playing an unwitting role in accelerating the trends that will culminate in the Great Dormancy Era.
No comments:
Post a Comment