Trump just said on national TV Musk’s next assignment is extracting billions and billions of dollars from the Military.
At the hospital with my grandpa who happens to love football so it's on TV, Fox just interrupted the pregame show with an interview with trump where he said this.
Please note I have not stated my own political views or that this was a negative or positive. Simply relaying info as this was the first I’ve heard of it.
Private Citizens Attempted To Audit Treasury Before and Congress Obstructed Them
Missing $21 Trillion Means Federal Government Is Lawless – Dr. Mark Skidmore Greg Hunter On December 3, 2017 In Political Analysis 181 Comments »
»
Missing $21 Trillion Means Federal Government Is Lawless – Dr. Mark Skidmore
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Early Sunday Release)
Michigan State University economics professor Mark Skidmore made an astounding discovery about the finances and budgets of the U.S. federal government earlier this year. He and a team of graduate students discovered $21 trillion missing in the federal budget going back to 1998. Dr. Skidmore, who specializes in public finance, explains, “We know from official government sources that indicate $21 trillion is, in some way, unaccounted for. Furthermore, if we come back to the Constitution, all spending needs to be authorized by Congress. It looks to me, and I think I can conclude with a high degree of certainty, there is money flowing in, as well as out, that is unaccounted for. . . . That’s the one thing we know from these documents, that there is $21 trillion in unaccounted funds.”
In one example, Skidmore found a huge transfer from the Treasury Department to the Army that, again, was not authorized. Keep in mind, the Army has an approved budget of a little more than $120 billion a year. Skidmore says, “In this one report . . . there is an appendix table that indicates there was a transfer from Treasury to the Army of about $800 billion. That’s almost a trillion dollars flowing in. There is a note that says we had to do this in order to reconcile past years. That doesn’t make sense to me either because, these earlier years, you have a transfer from the Treasury of your $120 billion or $130 billion, and every year, the Army is granted the authority to spend this money in the ways they say they will. How can you get (an additional) $800 billion in and call that an ‘adjustment’? I tried to call and talk to the office of the Inspector General to talk to the people who helped generate these reports. I haven’t been successful, and I stopped trying when they disabled the links.”
You heard correctly. The government cut off inspection of their own financial accounting to the public. Skidmore says, “I have been able to talk to a few people. I tried calling the Congressional Budget Office. I talked with somebody at the GAO, and one or two people at the Office of the Inspector General, who were generating these reports. . . .It’s a big question in why don’t people want to look at this? I am just a blue collar economist at Michigan State University, and I am saying this does not make sense to me. Why don’t we look at this? . . . Some high ranking government official authorized the disabling of all the links to the key documents. We know that.”
Dr. Skidmore thinks the federal accounting of $21 trillion in missing money is crazy and far outside the realm of normal. So, is this a legitimate U.S. national security issue? Dr. Skidmore says, “Yeah, and that is one of the reasons I decided to look at this. How can this be, and what does this mean? If trillions of dollars are flowing in and flowing out, it appears to be outside of our Constitution and outside of the rule of law. If that is the case, that really is troubling because it suggests that there is a layer of things happening that are outside the rule of law. I know, for example, that some activities, just for the sake of protection of the people involved in national security, have to be black budget. There is always stuff like that. Usually, it’s authorized spending, and some percentage is this black budget where only a small percentage of people and some in Congress know about it, but this is way outside of that. So, I am worried about it.”
CBO Auditors Find over $500 Billion in Illegal Payments Last Year Alone
How many people will be jailed for this embezzlement? How can Trump claw back as much of this as possible? This is all aside from the USAID theft and leaves one to wonder how much more theft and graft have occurred? You think Departments of Education and Defense aren’t as bad or worse? Then skate on over to the CIA, which has tentacles all over the whole mess. The reckoning is going to be shocking and has me wondering how the leftists will react? The storm of the century is brewing after less than a month, and it is going to be widespread destruction for the Fed traitors and their minions.
Twitter sale was a government bail out
The sale and transformation of Twitter, especially Elon Musk's acquisition in 2022, has raised various questions and concerns. Several anomalies suggest that the sale could resemble a government bailout or intervention, with a focus on key aspects of the transaction and the people involved.
Elon Musk's companies, such as SpaceX and Tesla, receive significant government contracts, including subsidies for electric vehicle production and renewable energy. This relationship raises questions about the strategic nature of his acquisition of Twitter, especially considering Musk’s ties to government interests. SpaceX’s national security contracts with NASA and the Pentagon further suggest that Musk’s control over a platform as influential as Twitter could have been seen as beneficial for national security, especially during a period of geopolitical tension.
Musk’s abrupt sale of Twitter, which followed his initial attempt to back out, raised eyebrows. His offer came during a time when Twitter’s stock price had fallen, and the company was struggling with its user base and profitability. The deal was completed quickly, without the usual hurdles and negotiations typical of corporate takeovers. Musk’s sudden shift in focus from space exploration and electric vehicles to Twitter appeared to be more about its geopolitical influence than its business viability.
Twitter has been used by governments for surveillance, disinformation campaigns, and intelligence gathering. Its importance as a tool for government control and information flow has grown over the years. The quick sale to Musk, who has known ties to government-funded ventures, could have been seen as a way to ensure that the platform continued to function in a manner beneficial to U.S. and Western geopolitical interests. There were indications that the U.S. government may have quietly supported or influenced the deal to ensure the platform remained aligned with national interests in digital surveillance and controlling online narratives.
Musk’s deal to purchase Twitter was primarily financed through loans, with his stake in Tesla and other assets serving as collateral. The debt burden raised concerns about Twitter’s long-term financial stability, but the deal was facilitated by favorable conditions, including government-backed loans or favorable financial terms from institutions with ties to government interests. This raised questions about whether Musk’s financing involved back-door arrangements that allowed the deal to proceed despite Twitter’s operational challenges.
Following the sale, Musk made drastic cuts to Twitter’s staff, which raised concerns about the platform’s ability to function as an effective surveillance tool. Critics argued that these layoffs could compromise Twitter’s core role as a monitoring and information-gathering platform for the government. However, Musk's focus on reestablishing the platform’s core capabilities, including bringing in specialized talent and maintaining critical functions, suggested that keeping the platform functional for national security or international relations was a priority.
Twitter could be seen as a national security asset, with its role as a key social media platform for real-time updates, activism, and news sharing. The quick sale to Musk, whose interests align with those of the U.S. government, suggested that the deal may have been part of a broader strategy to ensure Twitter’s survival and continued alignment with national interests. This could also be seen as an attempt to maintain control over a major tool of information flow, ensuring that the platform’s policies aligned with government interests.
Musk’s public stance on promoting free speech on Twitter was often framed as a way to encourage open dialogue. However, critics argue that his "free speech" approach could serve as a cover for more strategic motives, such as controlling the narrative around global events, especially those involving national security. The changes to Twitter’s content moderation policies could also be viewed as a form of regulatory compliance with government mandates, allowing the platform to continue operating without interference from censorship or content control measures.
Musk's decision to relax content moderation policies on Twitter raised concerns over the platform’s role in spreading misinformation or extremist content. Governments, particularly in the West, have long been concerned about harmful content on social media, and some suggest that Musk’s actions may have been influenced by political pressures from various sectors, including government actors worried about the influence of social media on elections and public opinion.
These anomalies, combined with Musk’s ties to the U.S. government and his ability to leverage resources tied to government contracts, suggest that the sale of Twitter may not have been purely market-driven. It may have been part of a broader strategy to ensure that Twitter remained a tool of influence and surveillance.
The One-World Religion Agenda: The Final Deception Is Already Here
Governments and global elites are engineering a universal religion—not to honor God, but to control the masses.
This isn’t a theory. It’s happening in real-time.
The Evidence: Look at What’s Unfolding
The Abrahamic Family House in Abu Dhabi – A single complex merging Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
Pope Francis’ Interfaith Push – Meeting with imams and global leaders, calling for “unity” over doctrine.
The UN and WEF's “Global Ethics” Plan – A framework to merge faiths into a government-backed moral system.
Censorship of True Christianity – Biblical teachings labeled as “hate speech” while all other belief systems are elevated.
This isn’t about peace. It’s about consolidating power and neutralizing real faith.
Why Are They Doing This?
The goal is not to end religious conflict—it’s to erase the distinction between truth and deception.
If all religions merge, truth becomes irrelevant.
If the state dictates faith, obedience to God is replaced with obedience to man.
If true disciples are labeled “extremists,” the narrow path Yeshua spoke of becomes criminal.
This isn’t unity—it’s forced compliance under a global authority.
Yeshua Warned Us About This Exact Deception
Matthew 7:13-14 – The broad road leads to destruction, but few find the narrow path. Matthew 6:24 – No man can serve two masters—yet they want you to worship both God and the system. Matthew 10:22 – "Ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake."
They don’t want to erase religion—they want to control it.
How This Prepares the World for Total Control
Once faith is state-approved, dissenters become criminals. Religious gatherings will be monitored and regulated. Standing for truth will cost you everything—but Yeshua already told us it would.
The Real Question: Will You Stand Firm or Follow the System?
This isn’t about rejecting others. It’s about refusing to worship a lie.
If you can’t say no to a fake religion now, will you be able to say no when they tie it to your ability to buy, sell, and exist in society?
The world preaches inclusion over truth. Yeshua warned the narrow path leads to life.
What will the military do in the Musk Coup of the US?
Will the military wake up and counter coup before it's too late? Or will it inevitably end up committing atrocities on its own citizens? Or is there a third option?
The world according to Trump is so out of touch with reality.
Don’t forget, Trump told to get the jab, he said it was safe, he shut down the country. He forced the military and government workers to get the injection. He told us it was safe(he got it) to mask up, stay home, all while he shut the country down.
Seems like people tend to neglect that and treat him as a savior: he’s just another one in the swamp. He’ll lead us further into hell.
WHAT THE FUCK ARE WE EVEN PAYING FEDERAL TAXES FOR IF THE GOP IS GOING TO SHUT DOWN EVERY PROGRAM AND AGENCY THAT HELPS US? OUR TAX DOLLARS ARE GOING DIRECTLY INTO THE POCKETS OF MUSK, TRUMP, AND THEIR BILLIONAIRE GOONS! GOLF TRIPS! THE SUPERBOWL! SPACE X! IVANKA'S PROJECTS!
Diversity Equality Inclusion are literally the fundamental attributes of the UNITED STATES of America. Looking down on diversity is not united, looking equality is not united, looking down inclusion is not united. The anti DEI is either a Russian tactic (Donald Trump has ties to Putin) or just genuine American rasicm (people still racist in America people hate to hear it but it's reality) but reasons are wrong regardless.
When people say they are against mediocrity they are against NEPOTISM. You guys remember that word right. THAT'S the mediocrity that's actually a threat to American society. Where the wealthy get to indoctrinate their children into positions of power based on nothing more than genetics. Literally no has mentioned Nepotism. This is confirmation about DEI being a racist dog whistle. If you again diversity you want to be the DIVIDED STATES of America. Which is pretty much Russia or China. You're not American.
No comments:
Post a Comment